VRT – Belgium

On 9 November, VRT published its vision on implementing AI to the daily practice of its workers.  

In this regard, the public broadcasting organisation is looking into the elaboration of a set of AI policies in line with its independence, trustworthiness and professional integrity.  

As mentioned by Tatjana Vandenplas, head of innovation development, the VRT is looking at “potential applications that can solve problems and add value” to their services. The use of generative AI will be focused on the creation of innovative content and making the process more efficient, but also on the automation of supporting process, such as the writing of summaries based on news articles written by journalists of the VRT.   

Key domains of focus for the VRT:  

• (Re)creating content 
• Strengthening accessibility 
• Factchecking 

The VRT also emphasises that AI can never replace a person but that it is a great tool to assist in different tasks.  

CBC/Radio-Canada – Canada

The emergence of AI is a real turning point for the media industry. In order to grasp the opportunities and tackle the many challenges it brings, CBC/Radio-Canada developed a set of principles to guide their use of AI in their operations.

Maintaining high journalistic standards and practices is vital for CBC/Radio-Canada, who designed their guidelines to ensure their public service mission can be carried on and enriched with the help of AI.

CBC/Radio-Canada’s approach to AI revolves around a safe, transparent and ethical use of AI tools. It also focuses on the improvement of their audience’s experience of their services, to make them as accessible as possible. One of the public broadcaster’s principles is also to collaborate with other media actors, education, research and technology stakeholders to “protect trusted news and combat disinformation”

France Télévisions – France

With the rapid development and growing presence of artificial intelligence in society, France Télévisions has included guidelines in its code of conduct on the use of generative artificial intelligence.

The public broadcaster insists that no content should be written by an artificial intelligence, although where there are some exceptions, this should always be done under human journalistic supervision. In an effort of transparency to the audience, any content produced with the help of Gen AI has to be labelled.

In addition to this, the organisation has created a service called ‘Les révélateurs de France TV’ to check content produced externally, before it goes on air. This service also has the task of detecting deepfakes.

BR – Germany

The Bavarian broadcaster has published its AI ethics guidelines, which it says is largely designed to ensure any new technology is utilised for its obligation to provide good journalism. “We want to help shape the constructive collaboration of human and machine intelligence and deploy it towards the goal of improving our journalism,” it reads. 

BR has published ten core guidelines that must be met when working with new technologies, but it says the work of its journalists is and will continue to be irreplaceable. 

These include how it benefits the user, how it can be used transparently, and keeping track of what data it is being fed. It also must be conscious of the diversity of Bavaria, such as how speech-to-text incorporates dialects. 

It says editorial control must be maintained at all times, and any news personalisation must not feed into creating news bubbles for users.  

SWR – Germany

AI presents opportunities and possibilities, such as for the expansion of digital research, to produce attractive and timely content and to make workflows more efficient. 

But there are complexities and risks, with AI posing fundamental ethical questions for journalism, such as the risk of wrong decisions, legal breaches, or publishing misinformation. 

SWR says the use of AI must provide a clear added value for its mission, and the organisation’s journalistic principles must apply without exception. Humans should always keep editorial control, make the final publishing decisions, and bear ultimate responsibility for them. All AI generated content must be transparently labelled in order to maintain credibility. 

SWR also seeks to contribute to the development of AI in journalism and is looking to participate in suitable initiatives and partnerships. 

ZDF – Germany

ZDF announced its own set of principles for use of Generative AI on 26 October. Nine principles in total have been outlined which will direct how Gen AI might be integrated across the organisation. But the foremost principle is that while Gen AI can support editorial teams, it cannot replace them.

Selected other principles outlined by ZDF:

1. 1. Commitment to transparency over how, when and where Gen AI is used
   2. Not using Gen AI as a source
   3. Content created with support of Gen AI is subject to principles of journalistic due diligence
   4. Gen AI tools will not be enriched with sensitive data, although some exceptions are possible, if reviewed by the editorial team

“In order to be able to use the opportunities of AI in everyday work, we have to be aware of the risks. That’s why we need the guardrails,” said ZDF’s Editor-in-Chief, Bettina Schausten.

LRT – Lithuania

Lithuanian Radio and Television has published guidelines it says will determine the responsible and ethical use of AI, while still utilising it to help fulfil LRT’s mission to inform, educate and mobilise the public. 

The guidelines say editorial responsibility should be maintained at all times, and additional protective measures should be taken when AI is used to ensure LRT remains reliable. Content generated by AI should be clearly marked, the document says, and the security of AI tools should be ensured. 

LRT says the AI guidelines apply to all employees of the organisation, as well as all creative employees and external producers who are contributing content to LRT.

RNZ – New Zealand

In its vision of creating “Outstanding Public Media that Matters”, RNZ has embraced the opportunities offered by new technological tools, such as generative AI, to support the workflow of the editorial team and assist their story telling.

In order to do so while upholding its mission to serve the public interest, RNZ has established a set of key principles which focus on transparency, oversight, and the ethical use of AI in the public broadcaster’s workflow.

Like many other broadcasters, RNZ emphasised that Gen AI remains a tool and stated “it will generally not publish, broadcast or otherwise knowingly disseminate work created by generative AI,”.

One of the fundamental principles of the public broadcaster’s AI guidelines is the necessity to maintain a relationship of trust with the public. “Above all, RNZ’s audiences need to be able to trust that our storytelling is robust, credible, and transparent.”

RTVE – Spain

On 29 November, RTVE announced its principles of responsible artificial intelligence. The proposal gives a set of guidance for public and private media on how to implement this new technology in their daily practice.  

The common thread linking the principles and rules laid down is that AI is considered above all as a tool. In no case would it replace professionals, but rather be used as an aid to improve their tasks and elevate the quality of the service offered by the media. This aligns with the foundational principle of public service media mission: to inform, entertain and educate, thereby upholding and reinforcing public service media’s democratic responsibility. 

In this regard, the principles established by RTVE state that AI technologies should be used in accordance with the tenets of democracy and “ensure, when AI is applied, the independence, purpose, universality, accessibility and responsibility of our activities and content” are maintained to “regain the credibility and trust of societies and audience.”  

RTVE also mentioned the importance of “implementing AI technologies at the forefront of the media industry in a responsible and human-centred manner,” to embrace innovation in a responsible way. 

Swedish Radio – Sweden

On 7 July, Swedish Radio published its policy for how it will use Generative AI, considering both the opportunities and risks presented by AI. The public broadcaster already uses AI in its recommender systems and news curation. It also uses AI tools to transcribe all audio to text.

But, as their News Commissioner, Olle Zachrison, outlined, Gen AI carries “significant risks – around journalism, law and security.” New and developing technologies capable of generating text, images, video, and audio “pose special challenges for serious media players … There are difficult balances to be made here in relation to our journalistic core values.” As such, Swedish Radio has established a company-wide AI council with three main tasks:

1. 1. Indicate which AI applications are of greatest strategic value
   2. Identify “journalistic, legal and security issues surrounding AI development and … propose guidelines where necessary”
   3. Initiate and participate in learning for all Swedish Radio staff

The broadcaster has published its policy document and the broadcaster has also promised to continue engaging in dialogue with other media entities.

SRG SSR – Switzerland

In an effort to adapt to the rapidly evolving field of Artificial Intelligence and Gen AI, and the changes it brings to the media sector, SRG SSR has developed a series of principles to guide their use of these tools.

Revolving around the potential but also the risks that AI can bring to the broadcaster, these principles establish a framework for using AI to enhance the quality of SRG’s journalism.

At the core of these guidelines, however, SRG SSR affirms the responsibility of humans over AI, as well as the organisation’s transparency on the use of the technology and the respect of confidentiality when using it.

PTS – Taiwan

In its AI usage guidelines sent to PTS staff, the public broadcaster outlined five basic principles which would dictate how it employs AI:

1. 1. Respect for human autonomy
   2. Avoid harm
   3. Fairness and common good
   4. Transparency and accountability
   5. Upholding public value

On top of these principles, the broadcaster also compiled a more specific usage guide, looking to pre-empt any potential mishaps or errors which could occur if AI was adopted without regulations. These more targeted points include:

• • One should not use AI to generate text or images for news reports and program content without full disclosure and following the reporting and consultation procedures
  • Program production and news reporting should ensure factual accuracy and avoid bias. Multiple sources of information should be adopted, and not solely rely on AI-generated messages.
  • Do not broadcast news reports and program content generated with the assistance of AI without review or confirmation.

Such a policy guide is imperative so all employees understand the boundaries through which AI can be used. The guidelines “serve as a benchmark for all personnel to employ AI techniques and tools, further facilitating the responsible and trustworthy development of AI in the field of communication.”

BBC – UK

On 5 October 2023, the BBC unveiled guidelines for how it will approach the use of Generative AI. Headed by Rhodri Talfan Davies, the BBC’s Director of Nations, the broadcaster will look to use the technology in a way that will “benefit all audiences and help us deliver our public mission” while also helping BBC teams to work more “effectively and efficiently”.

But Mr. Davies also outlined his concern over the “new and significant risks” posed by Gen AI “if not harnessed properly.” To ensure the right balance, the BBC has adopted three guiding principles:

1. 1. “Always act in the best interests of the public”
   2. “Always prioritise talent and creativity”
   3. “Be open and transparent”

The BBC announced it will start working on a number of projects using Gen AI, “in order to better understand both the opportunities and the risks”.